◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

BayOfPigsVolumeIVTheTaylorCommitteeInvestigationOfTheBayOfPigs

312 pages · May 08, 2026 · Document date: Aug 7, 1984 · Broad topic: War & Geopolitics · Topic: Taylor Committee Investigation · 5 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
Appendix A Topics for Tuesday [25 April 1961?] 1. Was there any doubt about the necessity of some such military action against Castro? 2. What was the estimate of the probability of success of ZAPATA before D-Day? 3. What was the feeling of likelihood of a popUlar upr~s~ng following the landing? How essential was such an uprIsIng regarded for the success of the operation? How rapid a reaction was expected by Castro? 4. What was expected to happen if the landing force effected a successful lodgment but there was no uprising? 5. What was the understanding of the position of the JCS as to ZAPATA? Was it appreciated that they favored TRINIDAD over ZAPATA? What did the President expect from the Chiefs? 6. Was it understood that control of the air was considered essential to the success of the landing? 7. What were the circumstances surrounding the cancellation of the D-Day air strikes? How serious was the ~e~i~ion viewed? What was the understanding about prelanding strikes? 8. What was the understanding as to the ability of the landing force to pass to a guerrilla status in an emergency? To what extent did this factor influence approval of the operation? 9. What was the understanding of the ammunition situation by the end of April l8? 10. What degree of non-attribution was sought and why? Were the operational disadvantages arising from some of the restrictions imposed by the efforts to achieve non-attribution clearly presented and understood? 11. To what extent did the CIA operations representatives have to "sell" the operation to the other agencies of government? Was any consideration given to transferring the operation to Defense? 254
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 261
Jump straight to page 261 of 312.
Reader
Taylor Committee Investigation Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the War & Geopolitics archive hub and the more specific Taylor Committee Investigation topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
pigs operation
Related subtopics
1P Ee
1 documents · 3 known pages
Subtopic
henry-murray
1 documents · 11 known pages
Subtopic
john-singlaub
1 documents · 23 known pages
Subtopic
SOVIET PROPAGANDA ACTIVITIES IN CUBA
1 documents · 592 known pages
Subtopic