Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 38
‹
Page 1
1 / 28
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED
FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)
DATE 12-09-2008 BY 60324C BAW/RS/VCF
-1-
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Date of transcription
01/04/2006
Social Security Account
was interviewed on December 19, 2005, at
place of employment,
Battelle,...505.King Avenue,.
columbus....
b6
Ohio,
OT
b7C
Special Agents (SAs)
Also present/during the interview was
Assistant
General Counsel, Battelle. After being advised of the identities
of the interviewing Agents and the purpose of the interview,.
was presented with an AMERITHRAX; Major Case-184 Non-disclosure
Agreement (NDa). After reviewing the document,.
signed the
NDA. At this point,
provided the following information:
indicated that over the past few years scientists at.
Battelle have isolated two different contaminants from Bacillus
b6
anthracis (Ba) spore preparations. One contaminant was determined
b7C
to be Bacillus pumilus and the other was determined to be Bacillus
subtilis.
These determinations were made using a 24 hour API
strip.
believes that both of these contaminates were purified.
from the Ba and may still exist as frozen stocks at Battelle's
Building.
stated that
In the course of reviewing documentation related to.
Battelle's Ba Ames spore preparations labeled BAAl77 at Battelle's
facility located at 1425 State Route 142, West Jefferson, Ohio,
noticed a discrepancy between Battelle's documentation and
an e-mail sent from
to Dr. BRUCE IVINS at the U.S. Army
Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (UsAMRIiD).
Battelle's "Etiologic Agent Receipt and Inventory Information
on
5/6/04. An e-mail
from
to IviNs suggests that Battelle was.
working with BAl77 in January of 2005. At approximately 3:30pm on
December
19
2005,
was asked about this discrepancy. SA.
was not
present during this portion of the interview..
stated that
viewed BAA177 and BAl78 as being from a single
sample
considered them to be from the same sample because.
IVINs indicated to
that they were the same
Ibelieves that
both BAA177 and BAA178 were contaminated despite that fact that
Battelle never actually determined if BAAl77 was contaminated and
assumed BAA177 was contaminated because BAA178 was shown to be
contaminated.
3oZ
Investigation on
12/19/2005
at Columbus, Ohio.
File # 279A-WF-222936-BATTELLE -- iO~7
Date dictated
N/A
SA
b6
by
SA
b7C
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBl. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency:
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic