Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Gov Edmund Gerald Pat Brown Sr — Part 7
‹
Page 1
1 / 50
Memorandum to Mr. Tolson.
Re: Edmund G Brown
Attorney General
State of California
calculated in the absence of population estimates by the Census
Bureau from individual places from which we received crime reports.
9573 GEE 27 our statistical
See in Philadelphia and requested specific
* AL criticisms of the Uniform Crime Reports. After considerable
a) conversation admitted we should continue to calculate our
rates as we now do, and the only real suggestion had to do with the
elimination of statutory rape, which has been done.
Section
On December 4, 1957,
at the Bureau of Criminal Statistics in Sacramento in conversation
with of the & _ and
t r
4 ield representative On three occasions
asked the point~- ton as to what suggestions
2 California Bureau has as to improvement or changes in the
Uniform Crime Reports and received no suggestions from them. It
should be observed that Mr. Beattie was out of the city and not
available.
spent several hours
L
Beattie, in his letter to Schrotel, changes his position
slightly in connection with the use of 1950 census figures and
criticizes their use because the "published rates are unjustifiably
used beyond their true validity even though readers are specifically
| cautioned that this should not be done.” He goes on the suggest
that it might be better if the crime rate tables be eliminated
altogether if current population figures are not available. This
'|problem is being covered in the report of the Consultant Committee
‘Yon Uniform Crime Reporting. Also, the Director has instructed
_jthat we are never again to use the 1950 census figures in the
| Uniform Crime Reports bulletin.
RECOMMENDATION:
The letter from Attorney General Brown itself does not
indicate a reply should be made, and to initiate any further
correspondence on the subject of Mr. Beattie'’s letter to Schrotel
would unnecessarily continue an argument over one word "“unjustifiably"
resented in the annual publication of the State of California.
Under the circumstances, it is recommended that no action be taken.
roof
as : Pa ;
ae . .
¢
a“
\ << 8/3. Se af
hed .
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic